Ở thread này: http://www.vietlandnews.net/forum/sh...658#post151658, trả lời số 17: Thành viên BaEd hăm doạ giết người.
Đề nghị quư vị có biện pháp thích đáng: phải báo cảnh sát ngay. Ḥng ngăn ngừa việc đáng tiếc có thể xảy ra.
Originally Posted by BaEd
Abuse người ta là điên, khùng (mad, insane) là tội h́nh sự đó nhen. Nó thuộc về verbal abuse đó nhen.
Định nghĩa về verbal abuse ở chỗ này,
Riêng Silver Bullet c̣n đ̣i publicize to online community t́nh trạng bịnh hoạn của người ta, tức là đă vi phạm confidentiality. Chưa kể người ta không bị điên (insane or mad, or mental disorder) th́ phạm tội vu cáo (slander). Hai tội đó đều là felonies.Verbal abuse (also known as reviling) is best described as a negative defining statement told to the person or about the person; or by withholding any response thus defining the target as non-existent. If the abuser doesn't immediately apologize and rarely indulge in a defining statement, the relationship may be a verbally abusive one. [1]
In schools a young person may indulge in verbal abuse - bullying (bullying often has a physical component) to gain status as superior to the person targeted and to bond with others against the target. Generally the bully knows no other way to connect emotionally ie. be bonded with others. [2]
In couple relationships the verbal abuser responds to the partners "separateness" i.e, independent thoughts, views, desires, feelings, expressions (even of happiness) as an irritant or even an attack. [3] While some people believe the abuser has low self esteem and so attempts to place their victim in a similar position, i.e. to believe negative things about him or herself this is not usually the case in couple relationships. A man may for example, disparage a woman partner simply because she has qualities that were disparaged in him, i.e., emotional intelligence, warmth, receptivity and so forth.[citation needed]
A person of any gender, race, culture, sexual orientation, age, or size may experience verbal abuse. Typically, in couple or family relationships verbal abuse increases in intensity and frequency over time. [4] After exposure to verbal abuse, victims may fall into clinical depression and/ or post-traumatic stress disorder. The person targeted by verbal abuse over time may succumb to any stress related illness. Verbal abuse creates emotional pain and mental anguish in its target.
Despite being the most common form of abuse, verbal abuse is generally not taken as seriously as other types of abuse, because there is no visible proof and the abuser may have a perfect persona around others. In reality, however, verbal abuse can be more detrimental to a person's health than physical abuse. If a person is verbally abused from childhood on, he or she may develop psychological disorders that plague them into and even through adulthood.
Verbal abuse includes the following: countering, withholding, discounting, verbal abuse disguised as a joke, blocking & diverting, accusing & blaming, judging & criticizing, trivializing, undermining, threatening, name calling, chronic forgetting, ordering, denial of anger or abuse, and abusive anger."[5]
^ "The Verbally Abusive Relationship" Patricia Evans. Pub. Adams Media Corp 1992, 1996, 2010
^ "Controlling People" Patricia Evans pg.191. Media Pub. 2002 by Adams Media Corp
^ "Controlling People" Patricia Evans Pub. Adams Media Corp 2002
^ "The Verbally Abusive Relationship" Patricia Evans. Pub. Adams Media Corp 1992, 1996, 2010
^ When Words Are Used As Weapons: Verbal Abuse - University of Nebraska, Lincoln Extension
Silver Bullet said that I, BaEd, am not a human being, but an alien.Ngay cả với 1 đứa con trẻ vô tội vạ mà cũng "nguyền rủa"... Thiệt là hết ư kiến!!!
Đúng là loại "???" (hết chữ để gọi) ...
Không xứng đáng với 2 chữ CON NGƯỜI, không xứng đáng được sống và sinh hoạt trong xă hội văn minh của con người.
Baed phải là 1 trong 2 hoặc thuộc cả 2:
1) Bị bệnh tâm thần.
2) Loại phi nhân, phi thú ... sản phẩm đạo đức tiêu biểu của xhcn "xuống hố cả nước" .
Và thuộc loại nào th́ Baed cũng phải nên đi khám bệnh đi... sẽ tốt cho bản thân và cho xă hội.
Và SB phát biểu (formally & publicly) và chịu trách nhiệm cho lời nói của ḿnh:
Bất cứ ai "binh vực" cho trường hợp này... th́ cũng là cùng loại... Namely: SON OF THE BITCH! và tôi sẽ làm hết sức để phổ biến cho cộng đồng, cư dân mạng biết như có thể làm được.
Defamation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Slander)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the malicious statement. For the 2009 film, see Defamation (film).
"Libel" and "Slander" redirect here. For other uses, see Libel (disambiguation) and Slander (disambiguation).
"Vilification" and "Calumny" redirect here. For the hate crime, see racial vilification. For the Catholic sin, see detraction.
Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, traducement, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. This can be also any disparaging statement made by one person about another, which is communicated or published, whether true or false, depending on legal state. In Common Law it is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).[1]
In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false,[2][not specific enough to verify] and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.[3] Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[4][not verified in body]
False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[5] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.[5]
In some civil law jurisdictions, defamation is dealt with as a crime rather than a tort.[6] The United Nations Commission on Human Rights ruled in 2012 that the criminalization of libel violates Freedom of expression and is inconsistent with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.[7]
A person who harms another's reputation may be referred to as a "famacide", "defamer", or "slanderer". The Latin phrase famosus libellus means a libelous writing.
Last edited by BaEd; 07-07-2012 at 12:27 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks